Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

​​​​​​​​In the Matter of the College of Dental Surgeons of BC and Dr. Bin Xu

Richmond, B.C.

Posted August 2​, 2019​; updated September 6, 2019

Discipline Pa​​nel Decision Summary


Dr. Bin Xu was registered with the College of Dental Surgeons of BC (CDSBC) as a general dentist who practised in Richmond, B.C.

A disciplinary citation was issued in September 2018 based on investigations by the College into complaints from 12 former patients of Dr. Xu. A discipline hearing was held in November 2018 regarding his conduct and competence, which addressed numerous allegations against Dr. Bin Xu.

Dr. Xu failed to participate in the hearing. This does not change the College's obligation to prove the charges set out in the disciplinary citation.


The Discipline Panel considered evidence and submissions, including testimony from patients. It issued its decision on June 12, 2019.

The College submitted that Dr. Xu's patterns of recordkeeping inadequacies including diagnosis, treatment planning, and informed consent is serious enough to constitute professional misconduct, and that his failure to respond to the College also amounts to professional misconduct.

The Discipline Panel found a concerning pattern of deficiencies in the treatment Dr. Xu provided to his patients, and found he was practicing dentistry incompetently*. The Discipline Panel found that:

"taken together, the issues with Dr. Xu's practice, including his practice of billing up front and not completing treatment, the fact that he took advantage of elderly and vulnerable patients and the nature of his dealing with both his patients and the College are very serious and crossed a serious ethical threshold."

Dr. Xu's conduct overall was characterized as professional misconduct.

View the full (redacted) Discipline Panel ​Decision (PDF – 68 pages)

The next stage in the discipline process is the penalty hearing. The penalty decision will be posted here once it becomes available.

* the Discipline Panel found that the following portions of the citation have been proven: paragraph 1-8, 9(a), (c) & (d), 10(a)-(b), 11-15, 17, 21(a)(ii), 21(b)(i), 22, 24, 25(a)-(b) &(d)-(j), 26(a)-(b), (d) & (f)-(h)& (j) and 28.